In an ideal world, analysts and investors wouldn't have to spend much time, perhaps none at all, trying to navigate changes in government policy. In that world, government (in terms of spending, taxes, or regulation) would be small and consistent enough that it would not require much thought.
Unfortunately, we don't live in that world. Government is WAY too big. As a result, we spend more time than we should trying to figure out what the government is going to do next.
Three major issues related to government policy are now looming large among investors' concerns. I am going to do my best to not make this political but what follows can help you understand why the government may hinder economic growth and prosperity.
First, when is the Federal Reserve going to start tapering quantitative easing (QE)? This one is probably the easiest to answer among the three, with Fed policymakers recently going on record suggesting the Fed will announce a tapering of QE by the end of this year and actual tapering starting in January 2022. Given our forecast of continued solid economic growth and inflation exceeding the Fed's projections, we think the Fed will conclude tapering by the end of 2022, perhaps even by September 2022. In turn, that means the Fed will start considering rate hikes by 2023. I don’t agree with that because inflation is a real problem now and restrictive monetary policy is necessary now.
The second question is about fiscal policy, which might still be under debate as you read this piece. The US Senate is voting on a so-called infrastructure bill, which has passed. Although sometimes touted by politicians and the media as $1 trillion that is fully paid for without tax hikes, the Congressional Budget Office recently scored it as raising discretionary spending by $415 billion in the next ten years while lifting budget deficits by a total of $256 billion, which means it's not fully paid for.
The key to remember in the near term is that the bill will still have a long way to go after passing the Senate. It looks like Speaker Pelosi will hold the bill hostage in the House until she can get enough votes for a completely partisan (and much larger) spending and tax bill that the left-wing of her party wants. But what if that other partisan bill can't pass in the Senate because some relatively moderate Senate Democrats balk? Put it all together and you have a political Rubik's Cube that will take months to solve.
Our base case is that late this year we get a bill – or bills – with total extra spending of about $2.0 trillion with some tax hikes. But it's possible – we'd put the odds at about 20% – that it doesn't get solved and the whole legislative project blows up, which would mean no extra spending and no tax hikes. This is not our base case, but shouldn't be casually dismissed, either.
If they pass, what kind of tax hikes are we looking at? A top tax rate of 39.6% on regular income (currently 37%), a corporate tax of about 25% (currently 21%), and a top capital gains and dividends rate of 24% (currently 20%, well below the 39.6% the Biden Administration proposed). The Biden Administration would like to eliminate the step-up basis at death for capital assets, but we think that's a bridge too far for Congress.
The last question is whether we're going to have another COVID shutdown like we had in 2020. That seems doubtful. We think a shutdown would be perceived by the country as a step backward against the virus at a time when Democrats are in control of the White House, the House, and the Senate, and the party trying to pass key legislation. If a shutdown results in a Republican victory in the Virginia governor's race in November 2021 that would make it even harder for moderate congressional Democrats to vote with the Biden Administration on taxes and spending. Look for more mask mandates and limited vaccine mandates, but not shutdowns.
Put it all together and what we have is a country that is spending too much time thinking about the government, which means less time thinking about innovation or producing goods and services that people really want. Hopefully, in the years ahead, we can focus more time on economic creation, and less time on thinking about government policy.
"This material is provided for general information and is subject to change without notice. Every effort has been made to compile this material from reliable sources however no warranty can be made as to its accuracy or completeness. The information does not represent, warrant or imply that services, strategies or methods of analysis offered can or will predict future results, identify market tops or bottoms or insulate investors from losses. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investors should always consult their financial advisor before acting on any information contained in this newsletter. The information provided is for illustrative purposes only. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of Geneos Wealth Management, Inc."