Broker Check

The financial markets have been on thin ice for two main reasons: Russia and rate hikes

February 15, 2022

The financial markets have been on thin ice for two main reasons: Russia and rate hikes.

I think an invasion of eastern Ukraine will probably start soon after the Olympics, to avoid embarrassing China, which is a Russian ally (for now). Not invading at all after a big build-up of troops, arms, and equipment, would make it tough for Russia to bluff in the future. By contrast, re-incorporating more of Ukraine into Russia would seal for Vladimir Putin an esteemed place in Russian history. 

As of this writing, the Russians appear to be pulling back or that is what they want us to believe. An invasion would likely set off a flight to lower-risk assets, but we don't think it changes the outlook for corporate profits over time, and so any downdraft in equities would be temporary and a buying opportunity.

Meanwhile, financial markets are also agonizing about how far and how fast the Fed will have to go to fight inflation. At the end of 2021, the futures market in federal funds was pricing in 75 basis points of rate hikes this year. Now the market is pricing in 150 - 175 bps. 

Those hikes aren't just warranted, they're needed. Consumer prices are up 7.5% from a year ago, the fastest gain since the early 1980s. "Core" prices, which exclude food and energy, are up 6.0% from a year ago. And with the M2 measure of money up more than 40% since the start of COVID, there is plenty of inflation in the pipeline. 

Given these data and the willingness of relatively dovish policymakers to consider rate hikes, we now think the Fed will raise rates 125 basis points this year. The most likely path would be a series of 25 bp rate hikes at the next four meetings, in March, May, June, and July, followed by a pause during election season, then one more hike in December. That makes five total in 2022.

Some analysts and investors think the Fed will go 50 in March. I would like to say that is great because it's so needed, but I would prefer small hikes so that the markets could get used to the movement in interest rates. The Fed is way behind the inflation curve and needs to catch up. But I don't yet think 50 will happen. Why? Because if the Fed is willing to go 50, it wouldn't still be expanding the balance sheet. (That means they are still buying treasuries from banks with new money to give banks more money to lend which helps to borrow and thus demand for goods and services.) What would change my mind?: if the Fed announces a sudden and early end to QE, Quantitative Easing, then 50 becomes our base case for March. (In the weeks to come I am going to write a commentary explaining how the Fed works and the mistakes, I believe they are making in policy which began in 2007.) 

The other open question is how forcefully the Fed will pursue Quantitative Tightening. The fastest pace of QT in the prior cycle was $50 billion per month. We think the Fed starts QT around mid-year, gets to a $50 billion monthly pace by year-end, and eventually gets to a $75 - 100 billion pace range in 2023. 

The key to remember, though, is that there's a huge difference between the Fed becoming "less loose" versus "tight." A tight Fed is still a long way off. For the moment, long-term investors think the Fed can wrestle inflation back under control with relative ease. The Fed calculates what the Treasury market expects inflation to average in the five-year period starting five years from now. It's called "five-year forward inflation." And that inflation forecast is still below 2.5%. 

As a result, for 2022, we do not think higher short-term rates will immediately generate an equal reaction in longer-term yields. Longer-term yields should move up and will be a headwind for equities, but equities should also move higher as profit growth (for the time being) more than fully offsets that problem. The key issue is when investors realize the Fed can't wrestle inflation down quickly and must push rates even higher. We think that's 2023 and beyond. 

According to FactSet Research, we have seen 72 percent of the S&P 500 component companies report their results through last Thursday. Of the 72 percent of companies that have reported results, 77 percent have beaten earnings expectations while 5 percent have met expectations and 18 percent have fallen short. When looking at revenue expectations, 77 percent of the companies have met or beaten expectations while 23 percent have fallen short. While these figures are very good, they remain below some of the recent quarters and below the 5-year average levels, signaling that Q4 2021 earnings season may not be as strong as anticipated. When looking forward to Q1 2022, there have been 64 companies that have given forward guidance for Q1 2022. Of those, 74 percent have issued negative guidance, while only 26 percent have issued positive guidance. Understand that I have projected a much lower forward movement of stocks as a result of slower growth in corporate profits. Expect, instead of the 19% growth in stocks that we have seen in the past 5 years, to closer to 10% growth. 

"This material is provided for general information and is subject to change without notice.  Every effort has been made to compile this material from reliable sources however no warranty can be made as to its accuracy or completeness. The information does not represent, warrant or imply that services, strategies or methods of analysis offered can or will predict future results, identify market tops or bottoms or insulate investors from losses. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.  Investors should always consult their financial advisor before acting on any information contained in this newsletter.  The information provided is for illustrative purposes only.  The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of Geneos Wealth Management, Inc."