The reason is that real GDP declined in the first quarter and might have declined again in Q2. If so, this could mean two straight quarters of negative growth, which is the rule of thumb definition many use for a recession.
Janet Yellen, our treasury secretary has said that we are not actually in a recession. Her reasons are based on a number of positive numbers that may suggest that we are not really in a recession.
I think investors are paying too much attention to the GDP numbers; the US is not in a recession, at least not yet. Industrial production rose at a 4.8% annual rate in the first quarter and at a 6.2% rate in Q2. Unemployment is lower now than at the end of 2021. Payrolls grew at a monthly rate of 539,000 in the first quarter and 375,000 in Q2. If we were already in a recession, none of this would have happened. That’s why the National Bureau of Economic Research, the “official” arbiter of recessions, uses a wide range of data when assessing whether the economy is shrinking.
In addition, it’s important to recognize that once a year the government goes back and revises all the GDP data for the past several years. That happens in July, including with the report arriving this Thursday. Given the strength in jobs and industrial production, it wouldn’t surprise us at all if Q1 is eventually revised positive.
I think growth in the second quarter could be at a +0.5% annual rate. Here’s how I get there. I am using data from First Trust’s economic reports.
Consumption: “Real” (inflation-adjusted) retail sales outside the auto sector grew at a 2.2% annual rate, and it looks like real services spending should be up at a solid pace, as well. However, car and light truck sales fell at a 19.7% rate. Putting it all together, I estimate real consumer spending on goods and services, combined, increased at a modest 1.2% rate, adding 0.8 points to the real GDP growth rate (1.2 times the consumption share of GDP, which is 68%, equals 0.8).
Business Investment: I estimate a 5.5% annual growth rate for business equipment investment, a 7.5% gain in intellectual property, but a 4.0% decline in commercial construction. Combined, business investment looks like it grew at a 4.4% rate, which would add 0.6 points to real GDP growth. (4.4 times the 14% business investment share of GDP equals 0.6).
Home Building: Residential construction looks like it contracted at a 4.0% annual rate. Mortgage rates should eventually become a headwind, but, for now, it looks like an increase in spending on construction was more than accounted for by inflation in construction costs. A decline at a 4.0% rate would subtract 0.2 points from real GDP growth. (-4.0 times the 5% residential construction share of GDP equals -0.2).
Government: Remember, only direct government purchases of goods and services (and not transfer payments like unemployment insurance) count when calculating GDP. We estimate these purchases – which represents a 17% share of GDP – were roughly unchanged, which means zero effect on real GDP.
Trade: Exports have surged through May while imports, after spiking late in the first quarter, have remained roughly flat so far in Q2. That means a smaller trade deficit. At present, we’re projecting net exports will add 1.0 point to real GDP growth, although a report on the trade deficit in June, which arrives on July 27, may alter that forecast.
Inventories: Inventories look like they grew at a slower pace in the second quarter than they did in Q1, suggesting a drag of about 1.7 points on the growth rate of real GDP. However, just like with trade, a report out July 27 may alter this forecast.
Add it all up, and we get 0.5% annual real GDP growth for the second quarter. Monetary policy will eventually tighten enough to cause a recession, but that recession hasn’t started yet.
According to FactSet Research, we have seen 21 percent of the S&P 500 report earnings for the second quarter of 2022. Of the 105 companies that have reported, 68 percent have beaten earnings expectations, 6 percent have met expectations and 26 percent have fallen short of expectations. When looking at revenue expectations, 65 percent of the companies that have reported have either beaten or met expectations while 35 percent have fallen short. The overall blended earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for Q2 2022 is currently 4.8 percent. As of June 30th, the expected earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for the second quarter was only 4.0 percent. Thus far into the earnings season, earnings are running ahead of expectations. We are just a fraction of the way through earnings season, however, and a lot of companies have yet to report so the current 4.8 percent earnings growth rate could change significantly between now and the end of reporting season. When looking at guidance, the picture hasn’t been good. With 11 companies having given forward guidance, 10 have lowered guidance and only a single company has raised guidance. This week is a very busy week for earnings reporting as more than 900 companies are set to report their results.
The growth in earnings is why the markets have moved up almost 10% this quarter. I believe this surge in growth will slow and then accelerate with the third quarter earnings. I think we have turned the corner and have seen the low point in the markets. I will weekly communicate how the economy is growing and what to expect from your investments. For now, it looks good. I am cautiously optimistic about how the markets will end the year.
"This material is provided for general information and is subject to change without notice. Every effort has been made to compile this material from reliable sources however no warranty can be made as to its accuracy or completeness. The information does not represent, warrant or imply that services, strategies or methods of analysis offered can or will predict future results, identify market tops or bottoms or insulate investors from losses. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investors should always consult their financial advisor before acting on any information contained in this newsletter. The information provided is for illustrative purposes only. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of Geneos Wealth Management, Inc."